Velsharoon wrote:
Is it worth playing without a Burgundy, as in is someone (presumably DO) taking over Burgundy mean they will preeminent like Selim did the other game, we just agreed he had won EU3 and to start again
I am happy enough to continue but if this game is destined to fail would rather stop now while we are ahead or start a new one.
The obvious solution to this would be to not let DO rape burgundy and take everything. Honestly I'd rather have Burgundy be AI run for the next session while we search for a sub. If by next week we still can't find one we can partition it up so that no one person gets ridic powerful. Like DO could take his culture group stuff and parts of the Southern netherlands while giving up savoy, England could take over the Northern Netherlands, and Thuringia could take over Ranok's hannoverian territories (honestly skrit is really weak compared with the rest of us).
But still I'd rather give it a week before doing that, so imo we treat Burgundy like we would a player that crashed.